A single BTC whale split a massive position into 100 smaller orders on Hyperliquid over a ten-minute window. Trading between $78,547 and $78,877, the account filled repeated chunks of $65,000 and $150,000 to quietly execute a multi-million dollar trade with minimal price impact.
SKR funding rates hit a highly negative -0.129% per hour before easing to -0.056%. This anomaly means short sellers were paying a premium to keep their bets open, signaling intense downward pressure or a crowded short trade that started to relax slightly after ten minutes.
SKR funding rates fell to a steep -0.1524% before settling near -0.1345% over a ten-minute window. This negative rate means short sellers are paying a premium to hold their positions, signaling heavy downward bias or a crowded short trade on Hyperliquid.
SKR funding rates hit a deeply negative -0.316% per hour, meaning short sellers were paying a massive premium to keep their bets open. While this pressure eased to -0.160% ten minutes later, the heavily negative rate shows shorts are still dominating the leverage on Hyperliquid.
SKR funding rates on Hyperliquid dipped deep into negative territory, falling from -0.3426% to -0.3961% in just ten minutes. This means short sellers are paying a steep premium to hold their positions, signaling heavy aggressive selling or a potential squeeze risk.
SKR funding rates plunged from -0.0775% to -0.3899% in under ten minutes, showing a massive surge in aggressive short sellers. Because funding is negative, these shorts must pay long traders to keep their positions open, making it increasingly expensive to bet against SKR.